Micromolar to Picomolar Converter
Common Conversions
| µM | pM |
|---|---|
| 0.000001 | 1 |
| 0.00001 | 10 |
| 0.0001 | 100 |
| 0.001 | 1000 |
| 0.01 | 10000 |
| 0.1 | 100000 |
| 1 | 1000000 |
| 5 | 5000000 |
| 10 | 10000000 |
| 100 | 100000000 |
| 1000 | 1000000000 |
| 10000 | 10000000000 |
Why this conversion matters in chemistry
Micromolar and picomolar sit a factor of a million apart, which means this conversion almost never gets used in one calculation — it shows up when two different stages of a project have to be compared. An early screening hit at 2 µM IC50 looks respectable; an optimized candidate at 200 pM is roughly ten thousand times more potent, and writing both in the same unit makes that gap legible. The arithmetic is trivial (µM × 10⁶ = pM), but the mental move is non-trivial: most of the interesting chemistry happens in the middle of the scale, and the ends exist mainly so you can talk sensibly about very tight binding or very dilute detection.
Formula
Worked Examples
The anchor conversion. A million picomolar in one micromolar is worth internalizing.
One nanomolar, written the long way. Useful when comparing a working plate concentration against a binding-affinity reference in pM.
A single picomolar. Well below what most bench assays can directly measure without careful method work.
A ten-micromolar screening concentration, expressed at the scale of a detection-limit reference.