Millimolar to Micromolar Converter
Common Conversions
| mM | µM |
|---|---|
| 0.001 | 1 |
| 0.005 | 5 |
| 0.01 | 10 |
| 0.05 | 50 |
| 0.1 | 100 |
| 0.25 | 250 |
| 0.5 | 500 |
| 1 | 1000 |
| 2 | 2000 |
| 5 | 5000 |
| 10 | 10000 |
| 100 | 100000 |
Why this conversion matters in chemistry
Multiplying by 1000 sounds like the kind of arithmetic that shouldn't deserve its own conversion page, and yet this is one of the most consequential factor-of-1000 errors in bench chemistry. Assay plates run at micromolar; substrate and cofactor concentrations are quoted in micromolar in the literature; but if you grab a 1 mM reading off a reagent label and treat it as 1 µM without thinking, your working concentration lands a thousand-fold too low and a reaction that should have gone in minutes doesn't detectably happen. A 1 mM ATP stock is 1000 µM — so a 100 µM working ATP in a kinase reaction takes 10 µL of stock per 100 µL of reaction, not the 100 µL you'd add if you confused the units.
Formula
Worked Examples
A standard ATP stock. Most kinase reactions pull from something close to this and dilute a hundred-fold into the working mix.
A common substrate working concentration — roughly where many enzymes sit at or above their Km.
The kind of IC50 you'd look at and think the inhibitor is worth developing further.
Fasting blood glucose in a healthy person is right around here — a useful mental anchor for the scale.