Nanomolar to Micromolar Converter
Common Conversions
| nM | µM |
|---|---|
| 0.1 | 0.0001 |
| 0.5 | 0.0005 |
| 1 | 0.001 |
| 5 | 0.005 |
| 10 | 0.01 |
| 50 | 0.05 |
| 100 | 0.1 |
| 250 | 0.25 |
| 500 | 0.5 |
| 1000 | 1 |
| 5000 | 5 |
| 10000 | 10 |
Why this conversion matters in chemistry
Nanomolar is where most drug potency numbers live; micromolar is where most enzyme assays are run. So this conversion comes up almost every time you're comparing a published Ki with the concentration you're about to put on a plate. The arithmetic is just a divide by a thousand — 500 nM is 0.5 µM — but the mental translation matters more than the math. A 1 nM binder is genuinely tight; a 1 µM binder is respectable but well below the threshold for most modern drug campaigns. Getting fluent with the step makes papers faster to read.
Formula
Worked Examples
A respectable Ki for a mid-stage enzyme inhibitor — enough affinity to matter, enough room left to optimize.
The kind of Kd you see for a tuned-up kinase inhibitor or a well-raised antibody.
A clean anchor point. This is roughly where most primary screening plates sit.
Where a lot of endogenous signaling molecules operate — receptor ligands, tight-binding peptides, that neighborhood.