Nanomolar to Molar Converter
Common Conversions
| nM | M |
|---|---|
| 0.1 | 1e-10 |
| 1 | 1e-9 |
| 10 | 1e-8 |
| 100 | 1e-7 |
| 1000 | 0.000001 |
| 5000 | 0.000005 |
| 10000 | 0.00001 |
| 100000 | 0.0001 |
| 1000000 | 0.001 |
| 10000000 | 0.01 |
| 100000000 | 0.1 |
| 1000000000 | 1 |
Why this conversion matters in chemistry
Pharmacology papers report binding and inhibition in nanomolar, but stock-solution math and most physical-chemistry equations want concentrations in M. A kinase inhibitor with a 10 nM IC50 is working at 1 × 10⁻⁸ M, which is the number that has to go into a Kd × concentration calculation or a Beer-Lambert absorbance estimate. Dividing by 10⁹ is the routine that lets a literature potency line up with a dilution scheme from a solid sample. The other direction of the same arithmetic tells you how many molecules of drug actually reach the target: 1 nM in a 100 µL assay well is still roughly 6 × 10¹⁰ molecules, which is never as few as the nanomolar label makes it feel.
Formula
Worked Examples
One nanomolar — the definition line, and a reasonable Kd for a well-optimized binder.
One micromolar in M units, the number that typically starts a dose-response titration.
A reasonable IC50 for a moderately potent inhibitor in a biochemical assay.
The sort of concentration endogenous steroid hormones run at in circulating plasma.