Skip to main content

Electronegativity Values (Pauling Scale) for Common Elements

Atomic Number Symbol Element Electronegativity (Pauling) Group Period
1HHydrogen2.211
3LiLithium0.9812
4BeBeryllium1.5722
5BBoron2.04132
6CCarbon2.55142
7NNitrogen3.04152
8OOxygen3.44162
9FFluorine3.98172
11NaSodium0.9313
12MgMagnesium1.3123
13AlAluminum1.61133
14SiSilicon1.9143
15PPhosphorus2.19153
16SSulfur2.58163
17ClChlorine3.16173
19KPotassium0.8214
20CaCalcium124
21ScScandium1.3634
22TiTitanium1.5444
23VVanadium1.6354
24CrChromium1.6664
25MnManganese1.5574
26FeIron1.8384
27CoCobalt1.8894
28NiNickel1.91104
29CuCopper1.9114
30ZnZinc1.65124
31GaGallium1.81134
32GeGermanium2.01144
33AsArsenic2.18154
34SeSelenium2.55164
35BrBromine2.96174
37RbRubidium0.8215
38SrStrontium0.9525
42MoMolybdenum2.1665
44RuRuthenium2.285
45RhRhodium2.2895
46PdPalladium2.2105
47AgSilver1.93115
48CdCadmium1.69125
49InIndium1.78135
50SnTin1.96145
51SbAntimony2.05155
52TeTellurium2.1165
53IIodine2.66175
55CsCesium0.7916
56BaBarium0.8926
74WTungsten2.3666
76OsOsmium2.286
77IrIridium2.296
78PtPlatinum2.28106
79AuGold2.54116
80HgMercury2126
82PbLead1.87146
83BiBismuth2.02156

Values are on the Pauling scale (Pauling, The Nature of the Chemical Bond, 1960; updated by Allred, 1961). The Allen scale (configuration energies derived from spectroscopic ionization energies) and the Mulliken scale (average of ionization energy and electron affinity) give comparable trends but different absolute numbers — never mix scales when computing ΔEN. Trend: electronegativity rises left-to-right across a period and falls top-to-bottom down a group, with fluorine highest (3.98) and cesium lowest (0.79) among elements that bond at all. Hydrogen at 2.20 sits midway, which is why it can act as either electron donor or acceptor depending on its partner.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you use electronegativity to determine bond type?
Subtract the smaller Pauling value from the larger and read off the rough character. ΔEN = 0 (H-H, Cl-Cl): nonpolar covalent. ΔEN ≈ 0.1-0.4 (C-H at 0.35): essentially nonpolar covalent with a small dipole. ΔEN ≈ 0.5-1.7 (H-Cl at 0.96, O-H at 1.24): polar covalent. ΔEN > 1.7 (Na-Cl at 2.23): predominantly ionic. The 1.7 cutoff is a Pauling-era heuristic — real bonds form a continuum, and HF (ΔEN = 1.78) is usually called polar covalent despite the threshold. Use ΔEN to rank, not to classify rigidly.
Why does fluorine have the highest electronegativity?
Three factors stack in fluorine's favor. First, small atomic radius — the bonding electrons sit close to the +9 nucleus, where the Coulomb pull is strong. Second, only a 1s² core shielding the valence shell, so most of the nuclear charge reaches the bond. Third, seven valence electrons mean fluorine is one electron short of a closed shell, so completing the octet is highly favorable. Pauling assigned fluorine 3.98 as the scale anchor; nothing else outranks it in any common bonding situation. (Some computational scales give noble-gas compounds higher numbers, but those don't show up in routine bond-polarity work.)
What are the periodic trends in electronegativity?
Across a period (left to right), nuclear charge climbs while electrons pile into the same valence shell — atomic radius shrinks slightly and the effective pull on bonding electrons increases. Down a group (top to bottom), each new period adds an inner shell that shields the valence electrons from the nucleus, and the valence shell itself sits farther out, so the pull weakens. Net result: the highest electronegativities cluster in the upper right (F at 3.98, O at 3.44), the lowest in the lower left (Cs at 0.79, Fr unmeasured but estimated near 0.7). The trend is the same skeleton as ionization energy and electron affinity.